Cincinnati Users Group and the Version Control Panel

Well I just finished up being part of the Source Control Panel at the Cincinnati Users Group.

I was very enjoyable. I think I did a fine job representing Subversion. Those of you that read my blog know that I got a good understanding of the system and methodology.

For those that are interested, I tend to tag allot of my research

Actually, I was quite surprised there weren't more questions about "Version Control Best Practices," "Branching Options," and "Database Versioning"

At the end there was much discussion about the "additional features" of TFS. I thought that was a bit unfair to SVN. SVN was designed to be nothing more then Version Control. Do one thing, and one thing well, right?

<PersonalOpinion>

Sure SVN doesn't have the "baked in" features like TFS does (and I'll admit TFS' integration is awesome) but with a few extra steps you can have work item tracking with trac. If you want Continual Integration you can always run CI Factory. If you want a better repo viewing experience you can install Fisheye. If you want code review you can run Crucible. With Subversion you have so many options.

Actually, I think being able to "choose" which tools you want to mix and match is a huge perk of using SVN. However, you do have to write the "glue" that holds it all together.

</PersonalOpinion>

All in all I had a really great time. There were a flurry of good questions and conversation. In the end, I just hope I helped someone learn something.

Remember,

Any version control is better then no version control.

P.S. If you have any additional questions about version control, ask away. I would be happy to address them.